There is a clear plot and plan to be seen, a reasonably well thought through plan of attack, a method to the madness. But to get down to the meaning? Fair warning: I’m afraid that would be both traumatic and heresy for about half of America.
The long and short of the matter is that P.DT, like Patton before him, is exploiting the enemy’s mistake of placing two major components of their forces under totally different command structures.
The DEI effort mounted by the “woke” demographic was, is, an attempt at government sponsored social engineering, what a bit more than half of America would call an attempt of a government treasonous against its own existance to coerce America into accepting the idea that whatever the fauxLiberal might declare politically correct is more important than the competence needed to stay alive.
Quite an ambitious attack plan on someone’s part. It failed in large degree because Empire Academia (whose official political arm is known as the Federal Department of Education), they who were tasked with debilitating the appropriate number of social substrates into having no choice but to accept the highly manipulatable and totally irrational guilt of “The Woke”, lost control of their Woke shock troops and allowed them to operate on their own recognisance.
The Woke, feeling themselves the elite of their campaign, and listening to their own command structure rather than those in possession of the full strategy, made the same mistake the Germans did in the Battle of the Bulge, they out ran and overran their own line of supply. They moved one, perhaps two, full generations to soon.
P.DT’s opening moves are IMO easily understood within the analogy: Patton wheeling his army north into a hero’s march counterattack on a temporarily stalled and vulnerable enemy.
February 9, 2025 @ 7:01 pm
There is a clear plot and plan to be seen, a reasonably well thought through plan of attack, a method to the madness. But to get down to the meaning? Fair warning: I’m afraid that would be both traumatic and heresy for about half of America.
The long and short of the matter is that P.DT, like Patton before him, is exploiting the enemy’s mistake of placing two major components of their forces under totally different command structures.
The DEI effort mounted by the “woke” demographic was, is, an attempt at government sponsored social engineering, what a bit more than half of America would call an attempt of a government treasonous against its own existance to coerce America into accepting the idea that whatever the fauxLiberal might declare politically correct is more important than the competence needed to stay alive.
Quite an ambitious attack plan on someone’s part. It failed in large degree because Empire Academia (whose official political arm is known as the Federal Department of Education), they who were tasked with debilitating the appropriate number of social substrates into having no choice but to accept the highly manipulatable and totally irrational guilt of “The Woke”, lost control of their Woke shock troops and allowed them to operate on their own recognisance.
The Woke, feeling themselves the elite of their campaign, and listening to their own command structure rather than those in possession of the full strategy, made the same mistake the Germans did in the Battle of the Bulge, they out ran and overran their own line of supply. They moved one, perhaps two, full generations to soon.
P.DT’s opening moves are IMO easily understood within the analogy: Patton wheeling his army north into a hero’s march counterattack on a temporarily stalled and vulnerable enemy.