DT has always had trouble keeping a crew. Self serving minions, yes, but a working crew? No. Word is he’s a miserable boss to work for.
That so many of his choices ARE controversial people says several things: first, that they are people known to the American public with deep histories in the public media concerning their positions on things; second, that they are controversial says they are not adverse to bucking the status quo in plain sight; and finally their status as controversial means that DT could and most likely wouls be prone to asking for resignations (the classic Trump “You’re fired!) at politically expedient points when he needed a scapegoat in the eyes of the American people.
WARNING:
PARANOID CONSPIRACY THOUGHT TO FOLLOW
That… is just DT’s style of management, and that is where resides the real risk to the nation: once DT has discredited the rebels within the populist/conservative movement, those most likely to to honor their own positions and attitudes to challenge DT on some point or another (be that challenge motivated by ethics or greed mux nix) is when the ringers, traitors and sabatuers will gain power… as the unknowns willing to endure working for DT as their replacements.
If the Democrats have half a lick of sense they’ll rubber stamp approve his choices, and then use that machine of theirs (in conjuction with any and every member of the FBI/CIA/NSA who honors their oath to the constitution) to make sure that when it comes time to appoint their replacements none of the candidates are, shall we say, suffering undue foreign influence?
Fred Thornton
November 16, 2024 @ 8:37 am
DT has always had trouble keeping a crew. Self serving minions, yes, but a working crew? No. Word is he’s a miserable boss to work for.
That so many of his choices ARE controversial people says several things: first, that they are people known to the American public with deep histories in the public media concerning their positions on things; second, that they are controversial says they are not adverse to bucking the status quo in plain sight; and finally their status as controversial means that DT could and most likely wouls be prone to asking for resignations (the classic Trump “You’re fired!) at politically expedient points when he needed a scapegoat in the eyes of the American people.
WARNING:
PARANOID CONSPIRACY THOUGHT TO FOLLOW
That… is just DT’s style of management, and that is where resides the real risk to the nation: once DT has discredited the rebels within the populist/conservative movement, those most likely to to honor their own positions and attitudes to challenge DT on some point or another (be that challenge motivated by ethics or greed mux nix) is when the ringers, traitors and sabatuers will gain power… as the unknowns willing to endure working for DT as their replacements.
If the Democrats have half a lick of sense they’ll rubber stamp approve his choices, and then use that machine of theirs (in conjuction with any and every member of the FBI/CIA/NSA who honors their oath to the constitution) to make sure that when it comes time to appoint their replacements none of the candidates are, shall we say, suffering undue foreign influence?