www.newsbreak.com /share/3713417933028-why-doesn-t-anyone-talk-about-the-controversial-pow-camps-the-allies-ran-in-germany-after-wwii

Why doesn't anyone talk about the controversial POW camps the Allies ran in Germany after WWII?

Rosemary Giles 7-9 minutes 12/12/2024

During World War II , prisoners of war (POWs) were often confined in camps. The Geneva Convention established the standards for their treatment. However, in camps located in Allied-occupied Germany, POWs were intentionally classified in a way that allowed the Allies to bypass these rules.

These camps, referred to as the Rheinwiesenlager and officially designated as Prisoner of War Temporary Enclosures (PWTE), are seldom mentioned.

Allied success in Europe following the D-Day landings

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0wyweQ_0xOjFmJ600
Sinzig prison camp, May 1945. (Photo Credit: US Army / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Following the success of D-Day , the Allied forces moved through occupied territories and advanced into Germany. Despite encountering pockets of resistance from enemy troops, many soldiers surrendered, making the Allies responsible for their care.

Initially, the custody of prisoners was divided between the British and American forces. However, by early 1945, the British refused to accept more into their existing camps. As a result, the responsibility fell entirely to the Americans, who faced the challenging task of accommodating the growing number of German POWs as the Allied advance continued.

To address this issue, the US Army established the Rheinwiesenlager , a network of prison camps spread across Allied-occupied Germany. These camps started operations in April 1945, and their importance grew after Germany's surrender the following month, as they played an important role in preventing possible uprisings against the Allied occupation.

Layout of the Rheinwiesenlager

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3UaZCI_0xOjFmJ600
Rheinwiesenlager locations throughout Allied-occupied Germany following the Second World War. (Photo Credit: Maximilian Dörrbecker / Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 2.5)

The Rheinwiesenlager was established on West German soil under Allied control. Positioned on agricultural land near railway tracks, these sites were enclosed by barbed wire fences. The area was divided into smaller sections, each intended to hold 5,000-10,000 people . Despite this design, many camps became severely overcrowded, accommodating over 100,000 prisoners, with estimates suggesting a total population between one and 1.9 million.

Detainees at the Rheinwiesenlager were primarily ordinary soldiers of the Wehrmacht , while higher-ranking German officials, SS members, and other prominent figures were relocated elsewhere.

There were no shelters for living quarters

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3oPqGE_0xOjFmJ600
A U.S. soldier takes part in keeping guard over thousands of German soldiers captured in the Ruhr area. (Photo Credits: Unknown Author / US Army / MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ARMY PREVENTIVE MEDICINE IN WORLD WAR II; OFFICE OF THE SURGEON GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, WASHINGTON, D.C. (1969) / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain).

A large portion of the camp's internal organization was overseen by the prisoners themselves, who took on responsibilities such as labor, medical care, and food preparation. Control within the compounds was frequently entrusted to fellow inmates, who were given extra rations to help maintain order and enforce rules within the confines of the barbed wire.

Though the camps were equipped with kitchens, medical facilities, and administrative offices, these spaces were not designated as living quarters. Instead, most detainees had to improvise shelters, often by digging into the ground.

Disarmed Enemy Forces (DEFs)

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1OrzrB_0xOjFmJ600
Female Rheinwiesenlager camp , May 1945. (Photo Credit: Department of the Army, Office of the Chief Signal Officer - Signal Corps Photographs of American Military Activity / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The harsh conditions endured by these prisoners, evident in their makeshift outdoor shelters, underscored the severe treatment they received from their captors. This treatment was permitted because they were classified as Disarmed Enemy Forces (DEFs) rather than prisoners of war (POWs).

Before the Rheinwiesenlager camps were established, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower implemented this new classification, effectively removing the protections afforded to POWs under the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War (1929) . American forces justified this decision by claiming that these individuals represented a state that no longer existed, thereby rationalizing different forms of mistreatment.

Was the inhumane treatment intentional?

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3Dy6RO_0xOjFmJ600
One of the largest concentrations of German prisoners, over 160,000 men, packed into an area in Germany, under control of U.S. Army. (Photo Credits: Camp for German prisoners of war. Unidentified location in Germany / U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NAID) 292564 / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain).

Under this classification, authorities could "legally" block Red Cross visits and withhold humanitarian aid. The Geneva Convention was specifically designed to prevent the abuse of POWs, but without its protections, DEFs were exposed to mistreatment with little accountability for their captors.

These events have led many to view the actions of Eisenhower and those in charge of the Rheinwiesenlager as intentional acts of inhumane treatment.

Rheinwiesenlager conditions

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1IpUSZ_0xOjFmJ600
Sinzig prison camp, 1945. (Photo Credit: PhotoQuest / Getty Images)

Overall, the conditions in the Rheinwiesenlager were horrific.

Historian Stephen Ambrose investigated many claims made about the camps, and concluded , "Men were beaten, denied water, forced to live in open camps without shelter, given inadequate food rations and inadequate medical care. Their mail was withheld. In some cases prisoners made a 'soup' of water and grass in order to deal with their hunger."

Begging for more food wasn't an option either, as those prisoners were often shot as "escapees," should they have gotten near the barbed wire fences. Reports also claim locals would be shot if they tried to provide aid to the POWs.

Legacy of the Rheinwiesenlager

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3AaxGy_0xOjFmJ600
German nurses being kept as prisoners of war (POWs) at the Rheinwiesenlager, June 1945. (Photo Credit: Galerie Bilderwelt / Getty Images)

Given the living conditions of the Disarmed Enemy Forces, it's no wonder the death toll was high. However, because they weren't officially known as prisoners of war, few records were kept. Instead, many Germans would simply go missing from roll call, never to be seen again.

Due to the lack of records, death estimates vary, depending on who you ask. The official statistics from the US Army state that around 3,000 people died while in the Rheinwiesenlager. German estimates, however, provide a figure of 4,537.

James Bacque, the author of Other Losses: An Investigation Into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II , alleges the number is between 100,000 and one million. However, his claims have been discredited by his peers.

More from us: The Battle of Cologne Saw a Legendary Standoff Between a Panther and a Pershing

New! Want to become a trivia master? Sign up for our War History Fact of the Day newsletter!

Regardless of the overall death toll, the treatment of DEFs has been heavily criticized, despite it going largely unnoticed in more recent years. Many have pointed out that the Americans violated a host of international laws on the treatment of prisoners, even though they weren't classified as POWs, particularly in their feeding - or lack thereof.