(© Anela/peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com)
In a nutshell
- U.S. hospitals are operating at 75% capacity (up from 64% pre-pandemic) not because more people are sick, but because the healthcare system has lost 128,000 staffed beds since 2019, equivalent to closing 160 average-sized hospitals
- Without significant changes, hospital occupancy could reach a critical 85% threshold by 2032, which experts warn could lead to thousands of excess deaths annually due to overcrowding, longer emergency room waits, and increased medical errors
- The crisis stems from multiple factors: staffing shortages (especially among nurses), private equity firms buying and downsizing hospitals, and an aging population that’s expected to need 4 million more hospitalizations annually by 2035
LOS ANGELES — America’s hospitals are facing an unprecedented space crunch that could reach dangerous levels by the early 2030s, according to new research from UCLA. The problem isn’t just about physical beds; it represents a complex crisis of staffing shortages, an aging population, and a healthcare system struggling to keep pace with growing demands.
The study, published in JAMA Network Open, one of the country’s leading peer-reviewed medical journals, marks the first time researchers have gained such extensive insight into hospital operations nationwide. The term “staffed beds” refers to hospital beds that have the necessary nurses, doctors, and support staff to care for patients. A hospital might have 200 physical beds, but if it only has enough staff to safely care for 150 patients, then it effectively has 150 staffed beds. This distinction is crucial for understanding the current crisis.
“We’ve all heard about increased hospital occupancy during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, but these findings show that hospitals are as full, if not more so, than they were during the pandemic, even well into 2024 during what would be considered a post-pandemic steady state,” says lead study author Dr. Richard Leuchter, assistant professor of medicine at UCLA, in a statement.
Researchers gained comprehensive insight into hospital operations nationwide through mandatory COVID-19 reporting. They discovered hospitals are running at 75% capacity, up from 64% before the pandemic. While this might not sound alarming, the implications are serious. When ICU occupancy reaches 75%, there are 12,000 excess deaths two weeks later, according to CDC data. For general hospital beds, an 85% occupancy rate signals a critical shortage, leading to longer emergency room waits, increased medication errors, and other dangerous complications.
The decline in staffed beds, from 802,000 to 674,000, stems from multiple factors. Healthcare staffing shortages, particularly among registered nurses, play a major role. But there’s another concerning trend: private equity firms are increasingly purchasing hospitals and maximizing short-term profits at the expense of patient care. These firms often cut staff, close unprofitable departments, and sometimes shut down entire hospitals.
Rural communities are particularly vulnerable to these changes. When a small-town hospital closes or reduces services, residents might need to travel hours for emergency care. Meanwhile, urban hospitals face their own challenges, often operating at higher capacities due to larger populations and more complex patient needs.
The situation varies dramatically by state. Wyoming’s hospitals operate at 43% capacity, while Rhode Island’s strain at 88%. This disparity reflects differences in population density, healthcare resources, and local policies. However, high occupancy in one state can affect neighboring regions as patients seek care across borders, creating ripple effects throughout the system.
Recent policy decisions have exacerbated these challenges. In June 2024, the U.S. State Department froze all new visas for international nurses, a move Leuchter describes as “potentially catastrophic” for addressing staffing shortages. This policy particularly affects hospitals serving vulnerable populations, which often rely heavily on international healthcare workers.
Looking ahead, the numbers paint a troubling picture. As Baby Boomers age, yearly hospital stays are expected to climb from 36.2 million in 2025 to 40.2 million by 2035.
“If the U.S. were to sustain a national hospital occupancy of 85% or greater, it is likely that we would see tens to hundreds of thousands of excess American deaths each year,” warns Leuchter.
Economic factors complicate potential solutions. Hospitals operate on thin margins, making it difficult to maintain adequate staffing levels while covering rising costs. Insurance reimbursement rates, government funding, and the burden of uncompensated care all affect a hospital’s ability to maintain sufficient staffed beds.
Some hospitals are finding innovative solutions. UCLA’s Next Day Clinic program, launched at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, has successfully prevented hundreds of hospitalizations annually by providing alternative care options. This model addresses cases that traditionally required hospitalization but can be safely managed in an outpatient setting with proper support.
Healthcare leaders advocate for multiple approaches to prevent this looming crisis. These include revamping hospital reimbursement schemes, regulating private equity’s involvement in healthcare, addressing provider burnout, and expanding training programs for healthcare professionals.
“In the slightly longer term, we need more innovative care delivery models that can reduce hospitalizations by diverting would-be admissions to specially-designed acute care clinics,” says Leuchter.
Lower-income communities and areas with higher rates of chronic diseases often face greater challenges accessing care when hospitals operate near capacity. This creates a cycle where delayed care leads to more severe conditions requiring longer hospitalizations.
As hospitals balance staffing shortages, financial pressures, and an aging population, the window for action is narrowing. The research points to 2032 as a critical threshold when hospital occupancy could reach dangerous levels nationwide. Whether through expanding healthcare worker training, implementing new care models, or regulating hospital acquisitions, the time for systemic change is now, before hospitals reach their breaking point.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The research team repurposed the CDC’s COVID-19 data tracking dashboards to analyze hospital occupancy metrics from nearly every U.S. hospital between August 2020 and April 2024. They combined this information with national hospitalization rates and U.S. Census Bureau population projections to model future scenarios through 2035. This comprehensive approach provided an unprecedented view of hospital capacity nationwide.
Results
The study revealed that hospitals are operating much closer to capacity than before the pandemic, running at 75.3% occupancy instead of the previous 64%. While the average number of patients staying in hospitals daily remained steady at about 510,000, the loss of 128,000 staffed beds has created a significant squeeze on the system. This increased occupancy isn’t from more patients – it’s from fewer available beds.
Limitations
Like any research, this study had some blind spots. It couldn’t predict changes in how long patients typically stay in hospitals, future medical breakthroughs that might reduce hospital needs, or new health challenges that might increase them. It also couldn’t fully account for how hospitals might share resources in emergencies.
Takeaways and Discussion
This isn’t just about physical beds – it’s about having enough trained staff, proper equipment, and adequate facilities to care for an aging population. The research suggests that without significant policy changes and innovative solutions, many hospitals could find themselves routinely operating beyond safe capacity levels, potentially leading to thousands of preventable deaths annually.
Funding and Disclosures
This study received substantial funding from multiple National Institutes of Health sources, including the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Key researchers included Dr. Benjo Delarmente, Sitaram Vangala, Dr. Yusuke Tsugawa, and Dr. Catherine Sarkisian of UCLA, with Sarkisian also affiliated with the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center.
Publication Information
This study, titled “Health Care Staffing Shortages and Potential National Hospital Bed Shortage”, was published in JAMA Network Open on February 19, 2025. This research was conducted by a team from UCLA’s medical school and affiliated institutions. The findings are freely available to the public, allowing anyone to review the detailed analysis of this critical healthcare challenge.