Skip to content

1 Comment

  1. Fred Thornton
    September 14, 2025 @ 9:56 am

    Hmmm… the killing of Charlie Kirk is proof positive that turning sacred cows into sacramental hamburger is dangerous work.

    IMO the language of the civil rights act had an unintended consequence that defeats a large portion of the original intent. The error revolves around the word discrimination. Had that language read “unjust discrimination…” things would have been fine, noble mission made. But it was not. That the authors omitted the word-concept of “unjust” left the gerund “discrimination” to dangle, effectively making it federal law that no one has the right to choose any one thing in preference to something else! After all, the act of choosing one DISCRIMINATES against the other!

    This oversight has been ruthlessly exploited by the fauxLiberal’s in their campaigns of covert cultural warfare against the United States… the tactic of what is called “identity politics” allows any group or lifestyle not chosen by the majority to claim they are being discriminated against and use federal law as a weapon of intimidation and coercion in the cause of degrading and debilitating said majority into defacto servitude of the fauxLiberal agenda(s).

    The enemy has done some serious damage to America using that weapon, which is probably what Charlie was trying to say without understanding the mechanism that caused and enabled his (and my!) grievance.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *