Stop Hate ? This is what Kirk believed in!
Charlie Kirk’s publicly stated beliefs and positions regarding non-whites, Jews, and immigrants were often controversial and frequently criticized as exclusionary or inflammatory.commondreams+5
Non-Whites
Opposed affirmative action, claiming it unfairly displaced whites and stating Black leaders benefited only from affirmative action, not merit.instagram+1
Made racist remarks, asserting Black women “do not have the brain processing power” to succeed without stealing a “white person’s slot”.commondreams+1
Criticized Civil Rights Movement, saying Martin Luther King Jr. was “awful” and the Civil Rights Act a “huge mistake”.commondreams
Claimed Black people were “better off” under slavery before the 1940s, though acknowledged slavery as “bad and evil”.instagram
Dismissed Black pilots as less qualified, expressing deep skepticism about diversity in professional fields.commondreams
Targeted leaders of movements like Black Lives Matter with hostility, and rejected diversity initiatives.aljazeera+1
Jews
Frequently used antisemitic tropes, blaming Jewish donors for “anti-white” politics and alleging Jewish “control” over universities, media, Hollywood, and nonprofits.trt+1
Framed Jewish philanthropy as “subsidizing your own demise” and said Jewish financial support fueled social decay through “Cultural Marxism”.trt
Publicly supported Israel, branding himself as a staunch ally and opponent of antisemitism – but his anti-Jewish rhetoric drew substantial criticism from Jewish and conservative circles.ynetnews+4
Claimed accusations of antisemitism were weaponized to justify censorship, and often juxtaposed “Jew hatred” with what he called “institutional hatred of white people”.jta+1
His affinity for Israel was often overshadowed by statements that aligned with well-known conspiracy theories about Jewish influence.collive+2
Immigrants
Supported Trump’s immigration policies, promoted the Great Replacement Theory, alleging immigrants (and sometimes Jews) threaten white Americans’ status.nytimes+1
Vocal opponent of expanded legal immigration, especially from countries like India; opposed more visas for Indian migrants and insisted America was “full”.ndtv+1
Frequently cited the “displacement” of American workers by immigrants and conflated legal with illegal immigration to justify stricter border controls.cbc+1
Equated undocumented immigration with criminality, likening border crossing to theft; rejected arguments for humanitarian immigration reforms.youtubecbc
Often described immigration as a tool of “globalists” aiming to erode white, Christian identity in the U.S..reuters+2
These points collectively characterize Kirk’s positions as strongly nationalistic, frequently aligned with far-right rhetoric, and often hostile toward minorities, immigrants, and Jewish communities—even when paired with public declarations against antisemitism or in support of Israel.economictimes+8
Evidently, the story comments reveal different aspects of confidence bias surrounding the subject.
Full transparency: I never heard of Charlie Kirk until the man got shot. Not that surprising, I’m not young, have fifty years of experience as a working theorist, been talking about covert cultural warfare for thirty of ’em, right wrong or lost in Detroit I have my own conclusions so I don’t need someone to explain to me why the world looks like it does.
That said…
I’m thinking we have a seriously disconnect in this country around the meaning of the word “hate.” From what I’m reading there’s a lot of less than complementary words that might be applied to Charlies’ stance on things, most of ’em can be found arguing against American Exceptionalism, but I don’t see hate. I see plenty of fear of the sort that happens when the conspiracy causing the fear is founded on social evolution being exploited by the opportunistic and unethical (of any nation!), but hate? No. Hate is quiet and cold and lethal, haven’t heard of Charlie shooting anyone for arguing with him.
Nah, if Charlie got shot for a reason two possibilities lead the pack… someone shot him to silence him on the subject of social media emotional conditioning schemes (brainwashing), or, he was shot to make him a martyr and seal in the young people’s fear to the point it will be easily manipulatable. Maybe both. IMO not likely it was a simple whack job, the story as told reeks of a professional assassin. What I don’t want to officially know is who hired him. You could get yourself shot for knowing that.
A foreign nation in our country illegally is not an immigrant. Perpetuating that lie is how we what you are.
we often use “soft” words for acutual thingm, ie undocumented worker is a person here illegally. The inner city is a ghetto. a getto is a place where whose disliked for various reasons is living. Shooter killed is “neutralized.”
You are sick. The man was shot by a coward like you.
Good bye forever Goodshit.